Lev Bishop wrote:
> Actually, pipe() is implemented in cygwin using win32 named pipes,
> not anonymous pipes, as I recall. But, you are right that using pipe()
> should solve this particular problem.
Hmm, that does appear to be the case.
Unless I'm mistaken anonymous pipes are just a degenerate form of named
pipes created by the system in a given namespace
(\Device\NamedPipe\Win32Pipes.$DWORD.$DWORD ?) so I guess you could say
they're all the same thing anyway. :)
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info:
http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpleProblem reports:
http://cygwin.com/problems.htmlDocumentation:
http://cygwin.com/docs.htmlFAQ:
http://cygwin.com/faq/