On Monday 18 May 2009 8:48:33 am Jason Daly wrote:
> I tend to agree that pkg-config is tidier, but
> I'm not sure why it's a maintenance headache to keep both, especially
> when they're both automatically generated from .in files anyway.
The *-config scripts are basically bash/sh scripts, that have a few things
replaced (version number, etc). I'm no expert with bash scripting, though. At
least, not to where I can fully grasp what the script is doing. If something
turns up broken in it, or not working as intended, it would be difficult for
me to fix it. And given that it's preferred to use pkg-config anyway, and
there's little-to-no use for openal-config, it doesn't seem worth it to
include.
_______________________________________________
Openal-devel mailing list
Openal-devel@...
http://opensource.creative.com/mailman/listinfo/openal-devel
