On 05/25/2012 12:06 PM, Kåre Nordby wrote:
> Hi Ole-Anders,
> We have the same experience. We have just now finished a upgrade at a
> school on the same HW/config. With KDE
> Thin clients where to slow, bot time for diskless not good.
It was slower, but still good.
> We changed to XFCE. Boot time is bit faster. Thin client can be used
Boot time was the same, login was faster.
> Customer thinks XFCE is easier. (They didn't understand desktop
> folders and activities in KDE 4.x). User is now satisfied.
Knut Olav Bøhmer
> We do not have measurments. We have to investigated more.
> Vennlig hilsen
> Kåre Nordby
> Daglig Leder
> Skolelinux Drift AS
> On 05/25/2012 11:47 AM, Ole-Anders Andreassen wrote:
>> I have used Squeeze a week now, and there are a lot of things to
>> like. But what I don't like, is that Squeeze seems to be slower.
>> Booting is slower, logging in takes longer time, and starting
>> programs also takes longer time.
>> I am using the same server hardware on both installations, same
>> network, same clients...
>> Anyone with the same experience?