Reviewers: xmichael-k,
Message:
On 2009/11/02 08:01:38, xmichael-k wrote:
> Nice work, very helpful!
Cheers.
> Don't worry if my comments are stupid... ;))
No, they're very useful.
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/143071/diff/1/2> File scm/page.scm (right):
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/143071/diff/1/2#newcode38> Line 38: (define (annotate-x? layout)
> What about
> (define (annotate? layout . dir)
> (eq? #t (case dir
> (('X) (ly:output-def-lookup layout 'annotate-x-spacing))
> (('Y) (ly:output-def-lookup layout 'annotate-y-spacing))
> (('()) (or (annotate? layout X) (annotate? layout Y)))
> (else #f)))
I can't get this to work, unfortunately. The rest argument will be a
list, and `case' doesn't want to match '(X) or '(Y).
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/143071/diff/1/2#newcode126> Line 126: (add-x-stencil (lambda (x)
> Again, this seems to me a little redundant. Maybe one add-stencil
procedure
> would do it?
OK, I'll combine the two procs and add an axis arg.
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/143071/diff/1/2#newcode134> Line 134: (if (annotate-y? layout)
> I would prefer to put the items to annotate in an alist and do a
(for-each)
That would be more elegant. :)
Thanks,
Neil
Description:
Start work on adding annotations for horizontal paper variables.
Please review this at
http://codereview.appspot.com/143071Affected files:
M scm/page.scm
M scm/paper-system.scm
M scm/stencil.scm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@...
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel