On 23-May-09, at 2:41 AM, Daniel F. Kudwien wrote:
> <Digital7> tha_sun: seems like it'd be a top priority for the
> project..given how significantly it improves the usability
Does anyone know of any papers studying the differences between
various editor types, and if any of them can be shown to actually
improve usability and user satisfaction? I did some searching, and I
found:
http://www.jasoncornwell.net/projects/BloggerFinalReport.pdfwhich is about a UI redesign of blogger.com; not much in there other
than that users found editors to be problematic for image placement,
and that the concept of previewing an edit didn't stick very well.
I also found this which may be of interest:
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/275269.275272It's from 1998, but many of the issues it finds about HTML editors
still seem relevant today. Complaints about poor code, overwriting
custom changes, and general unreliability are mentioned, which all
seem to apply to most of the JS editors today.
A comparison of WYSIWYG vs WYMIWYG would be very useful.
--Andrew