> Hi,
>
> I consider audio output mixing more like a job for the Javasound Mixer
> implementation than a software synthesizer impl. There are many
> implementations for javasound mixers. For example - I've been working on a
> Javasound mixer implementation supporting jack (
jjack.berlios.de). A similar
> implementation supporting the Audio interfaces you suggest should be
> possible (maybe they even exist already)
>
> regards,
>
> Peter
>
> On 10/5/07, King InuYasha <
ngompa13@...> wrote:
>> Yes, but does Gervill support mixing the audio output? Gervill seems like
>> a great choice, but being able to mix into PulseAudio would be important,
>> and afaik, the site does not say anything about its ability to work through
>> PulseAudio. Noting that I did not mention ESD, ESD has been out of
>> development for a few years now, and PulseAudio being a better replacement
>> for it, Fedora is switching and GNOME is considering getting rid of the ESD
>> requirement for GNOME, and perhaps they will put PulseAudio as the
>> requirement instead...
>>
>> On 10/4/07, Peter Salomonsen <
contact@...> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/4/07, King InuYasha <
ngompa13@...> wrote:
>>>> As for a software synthesizer, I think that TiMidity++ (
>>>>
http://timidity.sourceforge.net/) would be the best choice for the
>>>> job.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Gervill does the job perfect. It's also more interesting I think, since
>>> it's pure java. The performance of Gervill is great - I'm already using it
>>> for music production. Low latency, great soundbank support - great sound.
>>>
>>> It's available in Frinika which is a pure java sequencer/studio/synth
>>> software. I vote for Gervill to replace the current javasound synthesizer.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Peter Salomonsen
>>>
>>
>
