Re: Terracotta integration

>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>>
>> What might be worth thinking of would be a terracotta based page  
>> store
>> (extending AbstractPageStore - class that implements the
>> (de)serialization magic). But even so it would still be necessary to
>> cluster http session.
>>
>
> Thats what kind of what I was thinking, and if we store this
> TerracottaPageStore in the httpsession, rather than on disk a la
> DiskPageStore, then we can just use terracotta to distribute the  
> httpsession
> as normal and everything *should* work
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Terracotta-integration-tp18168616p18192381.html
> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>