I'm not trying to cluster the diskpagestore, im trying to implement a PageStore than can be clustered.
I needed to instrument the AbstractPagStore class becauase it is referenced by the inner classes of the TerracottaPageStore (the ones which are clustered), however I was thinking about this and have decided that I need to come up with a better way so that it does not need to be instrumented, probably by not using inner classes. I wasnt actually wanting to cluster the entire AbstractPageStore class.
The org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.pagestore.AbstractPageStore$SerializedPage class definitely does need to be clustered though as this is the object which holds the page in the clustered page store.
I havent created a JIRA issue yet as I wanted to get the code working first.
Cheers,
Richard
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Ari Zilka <ari@terracottatech.com> wrote:
> This is the agreed upon approach mimicking the DiskPageStore. No?
Well, the DiskPageStore takes care of storing pages, but by itself
would never be transferred across a cluster. So making it IClusterable
wouldn't make sense.
Eelco
