« Return to Thread: The limited usefullness of RTP of the PIC32 Program Flash Memory

Re: The limited usefullness of RTP of the PIC32 Program Flash Memory

by Matt Bennett-3 :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On Thu, May 31, 2012 10:52 am, Electron wrote:

> 1) is there a HEX to BIN converter for the PIC32? I know the HEX format is
> standard, and I even tried to write my own converter, but on some things
> like
> configuration registers I don't seem to be able to decodify correctly the
> HEX.

I am not aware of one. I'd be a little afraid of something like that,
particularly over a UART connection- considering the chance of sending
special characters that could break your character stream.

> 2) I have just upgraded to MPLAB v8.85: XC32 is just a new name for C32
> compiler?

As far as I am aware, yes, but it is also part of a larger effort- to just
have 3 Microchip compilers- an 8 bit (XC8) a 16 bit (XC16) and 32 bit
(XC32). The 8 bit compilers are mostly derived from hi-tech, the 16 and 32
bit mostly from gcc. I think the biggest change in appearance is that
there is just one (*1*) 8 bit compiler (from Microchip)- no
differentiation (at least to the user) between PIC10, PIC12, PIC16, and
PIC18(*)(**).


*Do not talk of PIC17.

**Or licensing. Like I said, these are just the rumblings of the voices in
my head, and are not connected to reality or any company I have been, am
now, or will associate with.(***)

*** or my grammar.  I'm an engineer.(****)

**** I also like KITTIES! I'm always ready to talk about kitties!

Matt Bennett
Just outside of Austin, TX
30.51,-97.91

The views I express are my own, not that of my employer, a large
multinational corporation that you are familiar with.
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

 « Return to Thread: The limited usefullness of RTP of the PIC32 Program Flash Memory