On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Gwern Branwen<
gwern0@...> wrote:
> More generally, my point is that the reasoning offered for the
> censorship is intellectually bankrupt.
Well let's not attribute to malice what better can be ascribed to
corporate do-gooderness. Obviously, if the NYT, in presenting
themselves to media, represented their case as being a tactic rather
than simply a gesture of compliance, then they now have a little issue
of journalistic integrity with everyone they dealt with.
I would have said "corporate integrity," but everyone would easily
figure out that was a pun.
-Stevertigo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l