haha, but it's not in the commercial businesses best interest to make it too easy to learn or implement the software since it takes away their own opportunity to provide paid support.
On several occasions when I've asked if a feature exists on this forum, or if a feature could be considered, it's been met with a "no, but if you purchase this support plan maybe we can help you". I looked at the pricing structure and also the docs to see if I could find out myself, and it just peeved me that the support docs are so flakey and incomplete for something claiming to be open-source.
Cleaning out the forums and making the wiki rock solid will say to the community that this is genuinely open software, and not some forgotten branch of a "better" commercial product, as it seems to be now.
Bugzilla from sgrayban@gmail.com wrote:
hah that's funny considering this project is co-spomsored by a
commercial business as it is. And second the wiki docs aren't even right
and even missing info and when I pointed that out I was told "what do
you expect for a free GPL program" so I have no intention to pay for
anyone to stop spam. Fix the outdated and missing docs and maybe we will.
