« Return to Thread: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()

Re: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()

by Martin Funk-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Am 06.07.2009 um 16:18 schrieb Jeremy Thomerson:

> A good overall read, but he also seemed to miss the reason we have
> getModel**Object**.  He doesn't think that's necessary, but misses
> that there is also getModel (without object) and the word does clarify
> the difference.
>
> Anyway, a good read on overall API design, though.  I'd recommend it
> to others with the caveat that I also disagree with his last part
> about the rename.
I did like the design part too.
Wicket used to be in a lot better shape in that subject, hopefully  
time will be found to work on that in 1.5.

mf

>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Martijn
> Dashorst<martijn.dashorst@...> wrote:
>> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/timboudreau/archive/2009/07/api_design_vs_a_1.html
>>
>> I guess he doesn't get why we did the rename. This reminds me that we
>> *really* should improve our release docs before we finalize 1.4!!!
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://
>> wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>

 « Return to Thread: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()