« Return to Thread: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()

Re: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()

by ronaldtm :: Rate this Message:

I understand the getModelObject() thing, but I not about the
getDefaultModel(). Why is that?

I've found an e-mail (
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-dev/200806.mbox/%3C23eb48360806190903y27f3baeaua2db57e39249743d@...%3E)
that states that it may be removed in 1.5.

Why rename getModel to getDefaultModel just to take it out later?

Not a critic, just trying to understand.

Tetsuo

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <jeremy@...
> wrote:

> A good overall read, but he also seemed to miss the reason we have
> getModel**Object**. He doesn't think that's necessary, but misses
> that there is also getModel (without object) and the word does clarify
> the difference.
>
> Anyway, a good read on overall API design, though. I'd recommend it
> to others with the caveat that I also disagree with his last part
> about the rename.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Martijn
> Dashorst<martijn.dashorst@...> wrote:
> >
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/timboudreau/archive/2009/07/api_design_vs_a_1.html
> >
> > I guess he doesn't get why we did the rename. This reminds me that we
> > *really* should improve our release docs before we finalize 1.4!!!
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
> >
>

« Return to Thread: Tim Boudreau doesn't like getModel() -> getDefaultModel()