> No, you have not done adequate testing obviously.
>
> I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with
> cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work.
>
> Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time.
> I see that you've said exactly the same thing to somebody else who
> couldn't get it to work.
Dude. Sorry things aren't working out as you'd like, but a nasty tone like
that just closed off any possibility of anyone here helping you. I think
your only two options now are to apologize or leave.
> PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list
Right! What else?
--
Problem reports:
http://cygwin.com/problems.htmlFAQ:
http://cygwin.com/faq/Documentation:
http://cygwin.com/docs.htmlUnsubscribe info:
http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
