So if someone removes something from any Wikipedia article and I restore it,
I'm guilty of plagiarism? IANAL, but I can't imagine that DG is guilty of
anything improper in this case, esp. if he says what he's doing in his edit
summaries.
On 2/15/06, Steven Ericsson Zenith <
steven@...> wrote:
>
>
> I see a number of serious problems with this approach.
>
> I believe there is a copyright issue since my taking "good edits" and
> remaking them in your name you are guilty of plagiarism. You are not
> actually deriving anything as the GFDL allows and you are not correctly
> attributing as the GFDL requires. Conversely, you are actually
> deceiving readers about the source of the material and misrepresenting
> your own authority.
>
> I would assume that if the policy is to role back all edits from a
> banner editor that the best solution is to apply the policy and expect
> that independent contributors will take up the slack.
>
> With respect
> Steven
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:StevenZenith>
>
>
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
