
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's
security policy.
Den Monday 24 November 2008 17.49.58 skrev Peter Landgren:
> This is what I did:
> 1. Changed so that the two strings were on the same line
> Now new complete string shows up! OK
> 2. Did undo of the above.
> Only partial string is shown now.
> 3. Looked with hex editor and found that the file probably had been edited
> in Windows as there were CR+LF all over the file.
> 4. In the hexeditor replaced CR+LF with LF.
> Now new complete string shows up! OK
>
> So, the question is now:
> Does this happens in other files, which have CR+LF so that we might have
> other incomplete strings in the pot file?
I answer my own question. I found only one file src\Filters\Rules\Note\_MatchesRegexpOf.py
that used CR+LF. (There was also a CR+LF in a comment in one file.)
See
http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=2515
I have only updated the s_MatchesRegexpOf.py, gramps.pot and sv.po.
but not the other *.po files.
Shall I do this too, or it might be better to note the translators about this?
/Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________
Gramps-devel mailing list
Gramps-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel