|
»
»
« Return to Thread: Trinidad vs Tobago
Re: Trinidad vs Tobago
by Udo Schnurpfeil
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Christian,
I know the issue with the forEach. There are many aspects to notice with
the interation stuff.
I've written a sample for tobago 1.0.x which works with the c:forEach
from the JSTL.
But this not works with Facelets and also not with JSP-Tag-Files
(because scriptlets are not allowed).
I think we will find a solution for Tobago 1.1, but I can't promise it
in the moment.
An other aproach might be using a binding to a UIPanel, an building the
components with Java-Code.
That is not nice and has some pitfalls, but may a solution for you.
Hope that helps
Udo
Christian Groove schrieb:
> Salut Udo,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> let me explain the actual status of the Tobago development:
>>
>> We have branched the development into the tobago-1.0.x branch and the
>> trunk which is the next major release.
> looks like, ..... that i was wrong. Tobago is still alive, great.
>
>
>>
>> The trunk (1.1.x) is an area of many refactorings and implementation of
>> new features. But the status is still alpha. Here is a list of issues
>> for the next major release:
>>
>> * Reimplementation of the layout management:
> (...)
>
> Another topic you may not thought before. Please reactivate the foreach!
> I had to code a database driven form with a couple of altering types
> of input-fields and selection boxes.
> The jsf-page was programmed as a dynamic formular engine. The taglib
> met almost all requirements i needed, with one exception: foreach !!!
>
> For this reason i hat to abuse the table tag, cause this was the only
> remaining
> container-element, that acts like a foreach. This solution had one
> drawback,
> the table size does not grow with its contents. So i estimated the
> size by
> couting the containing elements and patch the rows/size of the table,
> brrrr.
>
> [stage direction to the audience] time to boo Groovie
>
>
> Voilá, that was the reason, why i needed foreach!
>
> Groovy
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Udo
>
> Thanks for your good job. Does your company still uses Tobago ?
>
I know the issue with the forEach. There are many aspects to notice with
the interation stuff.
I've written a sample for tobago 1.0.x which works with the c:forEach
from the JSTL.
But this not works with Facelets and also not with JSP-Tag-Files
(because scriptlets are not allowed).
I think we will find a solution for Tobago 1.1, but I can't promise it
in the moment.
An other aproach might be using a binding to a UIPanel, an building the
components with Java-Code.
That is not nice and has some pitfalls, but may a solution for you.
Hope that helps
Udo
Christian Groove schrieb:
> Salut Udo,
>> Hi all,
>>
>> let me explain the actual status of the Tobago development:
>>
>> We have branched the development into the tobago-1.0.x branch and the
>> trunk which is the next major release.
> looks like, ..... that i was wrong. Tobago is still alive, great.
>
>
>>
>> The trunk (1.1.x) is an area of many refactorings and implementation of
>> new features. But the status is still alpha. Here is a list of issues
>> for the next major release:
>>
>> * Reimplementation of the layout management:
> (...)
>
> Another topic you may not thought before. Please reactivate the foreach!
> I had to code a database driven form with a couple of altering types
> of input-fields and selection boxes.
> The jsf-page was programmed as a dynamic formular engine. The taglib
> met almost all requirements i needed, with one exception: foreach !!!
>
> For this reason i hat to abuse the table tag, cause this was the only
> remaining
> container-element, that acts like a foreach. This solution had one
> drawback,
> the table size does not grow with its contents. So i estimated the
> size by
> couting the containing elements and patch the rows/size of the table,
> brrrr.
>
> [stage direction to the audience] time to boo Groovie
>
>
> Voilá, that was the reason, why i needed foreach!
>
> Groovy
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Udo
>
> Thanks for your good job. Does your company still uses Tobago ?
>
« Return to Thread: Trinidad vs Tobago
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
