« Return to Thread: Trinidad vs Tobago

Re: Trinidad vs Tobago

by Udo Schnurpfeil :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

I forgot the link:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tobago/branches/tobago-1.0.x/example/demo/src/main/webapp/best-practice/for-each.jsp

Udo Schnurpfeil schrieb:

> Hi Christian,
>
> I know the issue with the forEach. There are many aspects to notice
> with the interation stuff.
>
> I've written a sample for tobago 1.0.x which works with the c:forEach
> from the JSTL.
> But this not works with Facelets and also not with JSP-Tag-Files
> (because scriptlets are not allowed).
>
> I think we will find a solution for Tobago 1.1, but I can't promise it
> in the moment.
>
> An other aproach might be using a binding to a UIPanel, an building
> the components with Java-Code.
> That is not nice and has some pitfalls, but may a solution for you.
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Udo
>
> Christian Groove schrieb:
>> Salut Udo,
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> let me explain the actual status of the Tobago development:
>>>
>>> We have branched the development into the tobago-1.0.x branch and the
>>> trunk which is the next major release.
>> looks like, ..... that i was wrong. Tobago is still alive, great.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The trunk (1.1.x) is an area of many refactorings and implementation of
>>> new features. But the status is still alpha. Here is a list of issues
>>> for the next major release:
>>>
>>> * Reimplementation of the layout management:
>> (...)
>>
>> Another topic you may not thought before. Please reactivate the foreach!
>> I had to code a database driven form with a couple of altering types
>> of input-fields and selection boxes.
>> The jsf-page was programmed as a dynamic formular engine. The taglib
>> met almost all requirements i needed, with one exception: foreach !!!
>>
>> For this reason i  hat to abuse the table tag, cause this was the
>> only remaining
>> container-element, that acts like a foreach. This solution had one
>> drawback,
>> the table size does not grow with its contents. So i estimated the
>> size by
>> couting the containing elements and patch the rows/size of the table,
>> brrrr.
>>
>>    [stage direction to the audience] time to boo Groovie
>>
>>
>> Voilá, that was the reason, why i needed foreach!
>>
>> Groovy
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Udo
>>
>> Thanks for your good job. Does your company still uses Tobago ?
>>
>

 « Return to Thread: Trinidad vs Tobago