« Return to Thread: Two questions about the "tools-style" agenda

Re: Two questions about the "tools-style" agenda

by Adam Roach-3 :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On 3/19/12 10:19 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-03-19 16:03, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-03-17 21:52 Paul Hoffman said:
>>> Hi again.
>>>
>>> - Is the agenda supposed to be up to date? At the moment, there are
>>> two WGs on the "main" agenda that are listed as cancelled that still
>>> appear on the tools-style agenda. The latter was supposedly updated
>>> after the former, so there may be something that is not picking up
>>> "cancelled" notifications.
>>
>> This is because cancelled meetings used to have a note 'CANCELLED', but
>> this meeting they instead have a note 'CANCELED'.  I'm adding a fix to
>> the markup engine to catch this.
>
> I wonder why we are still using systems that require scraping
> information from plain text...

Sign up for the code sprint and help make things better. (Insert adage
about lighting candles and cursing darkness here.)

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF83Sprint

/a
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

 « Return to Thread: Two questions about the "tools-style" agenda