« Return to Thread: Updated version of futures library

Re: Updated version of futures library

by Peter Dimov-5 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Frank Mori Hess:

> I'm not quite sure what you're driving at with the above 2 paragraphs.
> Are you satisfied with your pseudocode scheduler's performance, or no?

I'm not sure, as it's hard to measure the performance of a pseudocode. :-)

To see how it fares, we need a benchmark based on a workload that is
representative for your intended use cases... one that cannot be trivially
rewritten to perform better using an alternative concurrency model. ;-)

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

 « Return to Thread: Updated version of futures library