« Return to Thread: Usage Manager for durable offline subscriber

Re: Usage Manager for durable offline subscriber

by Nicky Sandhu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

I have a test case that reproduces the problem. WARNING: This test case is not a unit test even though it uses the junit framework.

Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1449.



oops - that's the latest- must drink coffee before reading email ;)
Any chance of a test case ?

cheers,

Rob
rajdavies wrote:
Hi Nicky,

which version is that?


cheers,

Rob

http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/



On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Nicky Sandhu wrote:

>
> On revision 581885 I turned on debug messages on Usage.java and the  
> commented
> lines of System.out on Message.java and I see the memory usage  
> increase
> beyond 100% to something like 16500%. This causes a problem for the  
> next
> thing that calls Usage.waitForSpace(timeout) and causes an  
> indefinite hang
>
> The Usage.increaseUsage(value) does not check to see if it's full  
> and so can
> keep allocating even beyond 100%. This seems to be happening a lot  
> from
> Message.incrementReferenceCount() with no corresponding
> Message.decrementReferenceCount() happening.
>
> In my case it happens when a publishing to a topic (~ 1000 msgs)  
> with a
> offline durable subscribe with multiple hard disconnects from the
> subscriber.
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Usage-Manager- 
> for-durable-offline-subscriber-tf4572289s2354.html#a13051280
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

 « Return to Thread: Usage Manager for durable offline subscriber