On Wed, 16 May 2007 16:25:25 +0200
Marcus Lindblom <
macke@...> wrote:
> FWIW, The Xerces C++ API uses the same techinique to version their
> libraries. It also has issues with forward declaration, as that, also,
>
> needs to be done in the correct namespace.
Right... What type of feedback has there been to this approach among
the Xerces users/developers?
More meaningful, as it pertains to boost, is it something that has been
received warmly, or with disdain? I know nothing about Xerces, so...
how is its size relative to the size of boost, and does this approach
seem to be something viable for boost?
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
