> Firstly, the measured drive read offsets used by the whole AR+EAC system
> seem incorrect. The offset for one drive was established using an
> ingenious, but flawed mechanism that gave in incorrect value. As this
> drive offset was then used a refenence to determine all others, they all
> share the same error. More recent tests using a different and arguably
> better method have given a different drive offset, whic is much more
> likely to be correct.
Chris, what is this better method?
- Grant
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users