Re: Voting Process

by gnu_andrew :: Rate this Message:

2009/4/1 Mark Trolley <marktrolley@...>:

> Ah yes, thanks. I rarely see anything but Default when editing so
> didn't think about quality level.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Age Bosma <agebosma@...> wrote:
>> Mark Trolley wrote:
>>> Edits with no votes pass I believe.
>>>
>>
>> It depends on the Quality level:
>> http://musicbrainz.org/show/edit/conditions.html
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Age
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
>> MusicBrainz-users@...
>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> MusicBrainz-users@...
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>

Is there a known set of criteria for upping the quality level? I've
only seen 'default' quality too (and most of my concerns are with
releases I've entered from scratch). My intuitive understanding of
where this is appropriate would be when the release has a full set of
data (e.g. full titles, artists and times, inlay data converted to
relationships such as producers, composers, etc., any links to URLs or
other releases added).
--
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users

« Return to Thread: Voting Process