Naturally. I have read the draft and would like it to be adopted as a WG draft.
I find that it does a good job of describing the requirements around the problem.
Alia
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Giles Heron
<giles.heron@...> wrote:
Hopefully "yes please" here means "yes I've read the doc and yes I'd like it
to be adopted as a WG draft"? ;-)
It'd be great if everyone who has read the draft can respond to this call
(and if those who haven't read it could read it first and then respond!)
Giles
On 21/10/2011 16:46, "Alia Atlas" <
akatlas@...> wrote:
> Yes please
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Giles Heron <
giles.heron@...> wrote:
>
>> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>>
>>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-raggarwa-l2vpn-evpn-req-01
>>
>> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>>
>> Now that we've adopted the new charter E-VPN is in scope, and we have a
>> milestone item to submit a requirements draft for E-VPN to IESG by July
>> 2012. If you think this draft is a good starting point for those
>> requirements then please reply indicating your support for the draft. If
>> not then please reply giving some reasons why you think this draft
>> shouldn't
>> be adopted - which we can then debate.
>>
>> Please respond by Friday 4th of November.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Giles
>>
>>
>>
