Agree.
On 10/21/11 10:21 AM, "Giles Heron" <
giles.heron@...> wrote:
>This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>
>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sajassi-raggarwa-l2vpn-evpn-req-01>
>should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
>Now that we've adopted the new charter E-VPN is in scope, and we have a
>milestone item to submit a requirements draft for E-VPN to IESG by July
>2012. If you think this draft is a good starting point for those
>requirements then please reply indicating your support for the draft. If
>not then please reply giving some reasons why you think this draft
>shouldn't
>be adopted - which we can then debate.
>
>Please respond by Friday 4th of November.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Giles
>
>
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
