On 09/05/2008, at 6:19 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:
> Maybe we could start with the release procedure?
>
> This is what we currently have:
>
http://cwiki.apache.org/ARCHIVA/archiva-release-process.html>
> It's basically adopted from Maven's release procedure.
> Does anyone think the 72 hrs. voting time is not enough for testing
> the
> release? Or there's something wrong with the ordering of the process
> that we
> have now? Thoughts, anyone? :-)
>
I think this process will evolve, but I think it's fine. I would ask
that only publicly announc-able, final, releases go to the mirrors and
repo1, whatever the version scheme we use (we can use
people.apache.org/builds for the rest).
72 hours is a minimum as Wendy said - I'd leave it up to the person
doing the release to extend that if they feel it's necessary due to
the significance of changes.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
