« Return to Thread: What is optimized FOV really?

Re: What is optimized FOV really?

by Aron H :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread




On Jul 1, 5:57 pm, Bruno Postle <br...@...> wrote:

> Correct, though your assumption is for landscape format images, it
> is slightly simpler for portrait.

I think you mean that if the input images actually have a height
greater than their width, Hugin will still display the horizontal FOV,
which can then be used directly, because it's the FOV for the smaller
image dimension.

For our typical panorama, we take pictures with the camera in the
portrait orientation, but of course they are saved by the camera in
landscape. After optimizing, Hugin finds a roll angle near 90 degrees.

>
> >Is that actually correct? Can someone point me to where this is done
> >in the source code?
>
> math.c in libpano13.
Thanks!  I'll check it out.
Is anyone interested in a writeup comparing Bouguet camera calibration
to Hugin calibration? Somewhere in the wiki?

>
> --
> Bruno
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

 « Return to Thread: What is optimized FOV really?