Greg Reddin ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Mario Buonopane <
goodb@...> wrote:
>
>> I don't understand why you are working now on version 1.0.5 and one year agò
>> on 1.1.0! If you go in project summary you talk about version 1.1.0!
>>
>
> Mostly because (I think) 1.1.0 is meant to be used with JSF 1.2, etc.
> and the 1.0 branch is designed to work with JSF 1.1. I have projects
> that are currently using JSF 1.1 and I'd much rather be using a GA
> codebase than a milestone build. Plus I'd really like to see Shale
> release a GA codebase. It's been, what, 2 years? With the removal of
> the Tiles dependency I think 1.0.5 could be GA. So my main goal is to
> get a stable, relatively bug-free version of Shale out the door.
>
>
No, i don't remember that Shale 1.1.0 is meant to be used with JSF 1.2
but with 1.1. In fact i'm using with MyFaces 1.5 (JSF 1.1).
What does mean "GA" codebase?
>> No, sorry but your response does not help me because at the moment i don't
>> know if 1.0.4 has same fix of my version. I remember that when i downloaded
>> a snapshot version was because the stable version didn't work well.
>> I don't know waht to do know...
>>
>
> If you can identify your bug I can let you know if it is fixed in
> 1.0.5. If not, well 1.0.5 is not released yet, so maybe we can
> backport it. I'm working on the release now so let me know as quick as
> you can.
>
> Again, I'm sorry your experience has been what it is. In the future
> you will see more Shale work from me than you have in the past. We'll
> get there, but it will take time.
>
> Greg
>
>