I was in the middle of writing a reply when I saw your update
On 9/7/07, tpeierls <tim@...> wrote:
I think I've figured out how to work on HEAD and Branch_2.0 in two separately
checked out directories. I also have a fix for the code in HEAD.
So my question is now reduced to "Is it too late to check in DWR-Guice
enhancements to Branch_2.0?"
Hmm - I don't what to get into having to do multiple releases of several branches, so I think we should keep new features to HEAD.
If the enhancements are:
- safe
- can be moved to HEAD easily
- not going to require many extra releases
Then it might make sense to put them into 2.0.
Joe.
--tim
tpeierls wrote:
>
> I lost track of what was going on in the DWR CVS repository, and I'm
> trying
> to find my way back so I can address some long-standing issues with the
> DWR-Guice integration.
>
> I notice that Joe has edited many if not all of the files in
> org.directwebremoting.guice since the Version_2_0_2_RC3 tag was applied.
> The
> revision message is "adding missing comments, and removing warnings from
> guice".
>
> ...
>
> Should I be addressing this and other issues in the HEAD revisions, or is
> there a branch that I should be using?
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Which-CVS-branch-to-work-on--tf4387976.html#a12559290
Sent from the DWR - Dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
