Re: Why the Prelude must die

On 24/03/07, Stefan O'Rear <stefanor@...> wrote:
> This is a ranty request for comments, and the more replies the better.

Without responding to any particular comment, my opinion is that we
should have a minimal Prelude with functions like (.) that couldn't be
reasonably redefined in any function. Most of the list functions
should have to be imported, to encourage people to use a Map or Array
and so on. Read should be in Text.Read to encourage people to use
Parsec and so on.

I wouldn't necessarily be against a minimal Prelude/expanded Prelude
split determined by a 'module M where' declaration, as suggested by
Sebastian.

--
-David House, dmhouse@...
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe