WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

« Return to Thread: XHR LC comments

Re: XHR LC comments

by Julian Reschke :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The spec can't be more "ready" than all normative references.
>
> Sure it can. The concept of "origin" (for instance) is pretty well
> understood by browser vendors, and HTML5 is getting progressively closer
> to defining it. XHR1 doesn't need it to be perfectly defined to make use
> of it. Same with Window, probably even more so in fact.

So why then is the reference to HTML5 needed?

> ...

BR, Julian

« Return to Thread: XHR LC comments