« Return to Thread: XHR LC comments

Re: XHR LC comments

by Julian Reschke :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread


Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> ...
> Right.  Any time implementations disagree, the most likely conclusion is
> that the point on which they don't agree is not used much, if at all, by
> websites. Therefore the exact behavior the spec requires on that point
> doesn't affect the "compatible with the web" criterion.
> ...

Agreed. In which case it makes sense to either leave the specifics
undefined, or to standardize the behavior that makes the most sense.

BR, Julian

 « Return to Thread: XHR LC comments