« Return to Thread: Yet another What-camera-to-buy-question

Re: Yet another What-camera-to-buy-question

by mrjimbo-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Phillip,
For what your trying to shhot ( people etc in adverse lighting) I'd try to
go a good flash first. I understand what your saying about teh noise. If a
flash image is acceptible that's the most cost effective. Your not really
saying where your budget is at.. The expense is way bigger then just the
camera body as you'll need a lens or two malso an da few other periferals. I
would check to see if Olympus has somethig already or on te horizon that
will get you out of teh box before switching to Canon or Nikon unless your
looking for an excuse to do so. Anyway all the newer or more recent models
both FX and DX have much improved noise issues at higher iso's.. With FX
doing the best but costing more of course.

jimbo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philipp B. Koch" <pk@...>
To: "PanoToolsNG" <PanoToolsNG@...>
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 7:49 AM
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Yet another What-camera-to-buy-question


> Hello everyone,
>
> I am a Olympus E-330 user and basically like the camera a lot. With its
> Live View capabilities and the excellent lenses available for comparably
> low prices, I've been going well with it so far both for panorama shots
> and "normal" photography tasks. But recently I was shooting a big event
> for a company where I had to take photos of tech talks (on a dim lit
> stage) and people chatting with each other outside while the sun was
> going down. It has always been a problem for Four Thirds sensors that
> their noise behavior / low light performace is far worse than other
> cameras with bigger sensors do. I was already getting into big noise
> trouble when I raised ISO just to 400 (it would have allowed me to go up
> to ISO 1600), and when I was taking the tech talk shots I had to
> intentionally under-expose the pictures by about 1.5 EV in order to not
> get blurry pictures although I used a tripod and a lens that starts with
> F2.8. Sooooo -- my questions are:
>
> What DSLR cameras might be interesting for low noise / good low-light
> performance that:
>
> 1. Are rather mid-range than pro-cameras (regarding price, for example
> something like Canon 5D MkII would be too expensive for me)
> 2. Offer either a comparably high dynamic range capture and/or truly (in
> praxis) useable exposure bracketing features
> 3. Have enough necessary additional stuff than can be bought when needed
> (compatible flash, (wireless or cable-)remote control, good lenses
> (including a decent fisheye), additional battery holder...
> 4. Offer Live View
> 5. Have a turnable LCD monitor (at least up and down, left and right
> would be nice but not totally necessary).
>
> *Not* so important for me would be:
>
> 1. Fast picture series (3 pictures per second are OK)
> 2. High resolution (about 8 MP would be OK)
> 3. Ability to capture videos
> 4. Camera size (can be big and heavy, no problem)
> 5. "Full Format"-sensor. Certainly nice-to-have, but not necessary for
> me (I've always been taking at least 8 shots per panorama).
>
> I don't want to strat any flame wars regarding camera brands, and I'm
> sorry if I annoy anyone with these questions... I just thought: Where if
> not here at PanotoolsNG can I find such a large amount of knowlegde and
> professionalism with photography and panorama techniques. I'd be happy
> for any suggestions, although I cannot go and buy a new camera directly
> due to loss of money :-( It's rather a long-term decision, especially
> since I would have to change my whole system (each and every lens etc.
> would have to be bought again).
>
> Any response would be highly appreciated. And thanks to everyone for
> building and maintaining this great community!
>
> Best regards, Philipp
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> --
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.93/2206 - Release Date: 06/27/09
17:55:00

  ----------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.93/2206 - Release Date: 06/27/09 17:55:00


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 « Return to Thread: Yet another What-camera-to-buy-question