WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days.
If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration
on the Nabble Support forum.
Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.
GNU Mach is not fundamentally obsolete or bad, I really do
not understand where people get this idea from.
That's what is said about GNU Mach...
According to what Marcos told me, GNU Mach is fundamentally
incapable of properly doing the job we had in mind for it to do.
This begs the question, what do we have in mind? What should GNU
This does not mean it is fundamentally useless for all uses. It
might be fine on a computer only used by one person, according to
my memories of the issues. But that won't really excite people, I
think. So we need Hurd-NG for a real success.
There are a couple multi-users systems out there that run GNU/Hurd,
and they run suprisingly well. Barry deFreese maintains them, he
share his insights on that topic.