« Return to Thread: alternative to urlZipInstaller

Re: alternative to urlZipInstaller

by Paul Hammes :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi Alexander,

my project admin doesn't want to have this zip installed on a web host. He wants it in the same repository as all other resources.

Cheers

Paul

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 +0100
> Von: Alexander Brill <alex@...>
> An: user@...
> Betreff: Re: [cargo-user] alternative to urlZipInstaller

> On Feb 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Paul Hammes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'am using the cargo plugin with tomcat5x. The only way I found to  
> > install tomcat is using the zipUrlInstaller as defined in the  
> > documentation.
> > see: http://cargo.codehaus.org/Installer
> >
> > I did some changes to the tomcat5x package (using the  
> > VirtualClassLoader from Tomcat6 for our project) and want to load it  
> > from our repository. Is there another solution to solve this issue?
> >
>
>
> Can't you just zip up your modified package, put it on a web host, and  
> change the installUrl?
>
> Alexander
> http://brill.no
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>

--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


 « Return to Thread: alternative to urlZipInstaller