On Wednesday 22 April 2009 09:30:29 nescivi wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 03:03:12 Scott Wilson wrote:
> > On 22 Apr 2009, at 05:09, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > Please let me know when you are done... also, did anything happen
> > > with MixedMessages?
> >
> > It's really quite hard to say...
>
> It really seems that Josh was interpreting it as a MissedMessage...
> ;)
Actually that class might be hard to implement, as we'd need to have a way to
keep track of the sender, to ensure that that one assumes the receiver got
the message.
sincerely,
Marije
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.):
http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtmlarchive:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/search:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
