« Return to Thread: as of present time, is it still true that 4000 A.D. will NOT be a leap year?

Re: as of present time, is it still true that 4000 A.D. will NOT be a leap year?

by Brillig :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

The 4000 year exception is a proposal by people who are trying to
bring the mean year closer to their target tropical year. But the
Gregorian calendar is meant to follow not the tropical year, but the
northward equinox year, and that adjustment makes it less, not more
accurate. Additionally, adding another adjustment like that increases
the jitter of the calendar, thus lessening the value of such an
adjustment.

Victor

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:39 AM, gerry_lowry (alliston ontario canada)
<gerry.lowry@...> wrote:

> Hello ... I can not find an authoritative source.
>
> I have been under the impression that 4000 A.D. is an exception
> to the divisible by 400 rule and therefore 4000 will NOT be a leap year.
>
> Unfortunately Wikipedia is not authoritative.  A number of sources
> I've found via Google seem to be quoting each other.
>
> Will 4000 be a leap year?
>
> (If yes, then we have a year 4000 problem ~~ not that that will affect all of us alive today;
>  with advances in modern science, if we do not destroy each other and/or the planet,
>  it may be a problem for some of us, or at least some of our descendants.)
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Gerry (Lowry)
>
>

 « Return to Thread: as of present time, is it still true that 4000 A.D. will NOT be a leap year?