WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

 « Return to Thread: auto add spam/ham for manual learning

Re: auto add spam/ham for manual learning

by John Hardin :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:

> John Hardin wrote:
>>  The best you can do if you're doing forwarding for training, is to
>>  require that the original ham/spam be forwarded as an RFC822 attachment,
>
> Outlook is not consistently capable of doing this correctly - worse, the
> behaviour changes depending on whether you're forwarding one message ore
> more than one.  O_o

YGBFKM. But then, it's Outhouse, so I shouldn't be surprised.

> Either way, I wouldn't recommend auto-training on user-submitted mail unless
> you have a small userbase you can talk to individually, in person.

...yeah, there's that, too. "Your users are out to destroy your network"
is a healthy admin attitude, not paranioa. :)

--
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@...    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@...
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   A well educated Electorate, being necessary to the liberty of a
   free State, the Right of the People to Keep and Read Books,
   shall not be infringed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Today: Thomas Jefferson's 269th Birthday

 « Return to Thread: auto add spam/ham for manual learning