On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:43 +0400, Trushin Igor wrote:
> use_bayes 1
> bayes_min_ham_num 10
> bayes_min_spam_num 20
> -100 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
> 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
50_scores.cf: score MISSING_SUBJECT 2.307 1.285 2.476 1.762
SA 3.2.5 stock scores. So you are using score-set 1, network tests
enabled, but Bayes DISABLED.
Forgot to restart your spamd daemon? Well, or you just did not yet learn
sufficient ham and spam beyond your (incredible low) thresholds, so you
are not using score-set 3 with Bayes.
> We see that with -98.7 points and option
> "bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -10",
> but "autolearn=no". Why?
20_compensate.cf: tflags ALL_TRUSTED nice userconf
tflags userconf rules are ignored for auto-learning [1]. Thus, as far as
the AutoLearnThreshold plugin is concerned, the message scored 1.285,
which is not below your auto-learn ham threshold.
Also note, that auto-learning uses a non-Bayes score-set internally for
training decisions, which is either score-set 0 or 1 -- coincidentally
in this case, what has been used anyway.
guenther
[1]
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
