Re: batches for web

alec wrote:

> Akkana Peck wrote:
[..]

>> Resolution (as in dots-per-inch) is irrelevant for images used on
>> web-pages. The only thing that counts is the number of pixels.
>>
> Huh, I thought that lower resolution would make the file size smaller so
> web images would load faster.  No?

Depends what you are *really* referring to.
See http://www.scantips.com/basics01.html

--
Bob Long
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@...
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user