What would be the benefit of a 0.1sec control rate? That's going to be
really bad for kr UGen shapes (which will turn into 0.1sec line
segments instead of nice curves), timing resolution on the server,
probably more stuff I can't think of now.
Whatever cpu savings you think you might get by slowing down control
rate, it's probably not worth it.
On the other hand, if you were trying to set the "driver's block size":
o.hardwareBufferSize = ***; // expected to be a power of 2
The only time I changed this, though, was to lower it to get less
audio input latency.
hjh
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Lucas Samaruga <
samarugalucas@...> wrote:
> Hi
> Is there a problems with the block size?
> This dosn't make any sound:
> (
> o = Server.local.options;
> o.blockSize_( 4410 );
> s.boot;
> )
> { SinOsc.ar(440, 0, 0.1) }.play(s);
> when boot the message is:
> SC_AudioDriver: sample rate = 44100.000000, driver's block size = 512
> Thanks
> Lucas
>
--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@...
http://www.dewdrop-world.net"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
info (subscription, etc.):
http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtmlarchive:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/search:
http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
