Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Dear Boost community,
>
> do we have a function object template to wrap arbitrary constructor
> calls / operator new expressions somewhere in Boost, already?
Yes, it's in_place.
Used by optional, for example.
For some reason though it seems there is no definition for default
constructors, but that can be added trivially.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost