Good point.
Any other opinions on this? Either way, nunit is going to be an anomaly.
- Brett
On 31/10/2008, at 10:27 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Brett Porter <
brett@...>
> wrote:
>> What I'm led to believe is that CamelCase is the convention for
>> artifacts,
>> and that NUnit might be an exception. For that reason, I have
>> <finalName>nunit.framework</finalName> in the POM rather than break
>> the
>> convention on the artifact ID.
>>
>> Is everyone ok with:
>> * CamelCase as the convention for artifact IDs
>> * using finalName for NUnit rather than changing the artifact ID
>> * selection of (b) below
>
> I think we should respect the name of the artifact as shipped by NUnit
> (and installed into the GAC by the NUnit installer). Otherwise when
> NMaven tries to import a project and searches the repository based on
> the reference in the project file, it isn't going to find a match.
>
> In Java most things are lowercase-with-dashes, but a few artifacts
> like UMLGraph aren't.
>
> --
> Wendy
--
Brett Porter
brett@...
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/