Rinke Hoekstra wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 2 jun 2009, at 11:05, Thomas Schneider wrote:
>> Ah, this looks good! :)
>>
> Thanks! :)
>
>> I'm just puzzled why you say that "publishesBook" doesn't have to be a
>> subproperty of "publishes". If it isn't, then it could be the
>> universal property. I doubt that this is desired here. So if I'm not
>> overlooking anything, I would want to add this subproperty axiom.
>
> Hmm... I'm sure it wouldn't really do any harm to do so, but I don't
> know whether it solves anything either... i.e. publishes 'could' be the
> universal property as well...
Hi All,
I believe that if you assert publishesBook to be a subproperty of publishes will result in a
irregular role hierarchy (together with the role chain of course).
Greetings,
-gstoil
>
> -Rinke
>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What happens is that any individual of type Book (e.g. YourBook) will
>>> 'get' an isBook relation with itself. Given a publisher individual
>>> (Springer) that has a publishes relation with YourBook, these
>>> properties will form a chain publishes, isBook... which is a sub
>>> property of publishesBook, and therefore the relation publishesBook
>>> will relate Springer to YourBook.
>>>
>>> Obviously you can easily do the same for publishesNewspaper &c.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, you can do the same for just the inverse (without a
>>> 'publishes' property): isBook o publishedBy -> bookPublishedBy
>>> Add publishesBook as inverse of bookPublishedBy to get the relation
>>> you wanted.
>>>
>>> Oh, and [2]
>>>
>>> -Rinke
>>>
>>> [1] shameless self-advertisement:
>>>
http://www.amazon.com/Ontology-Representation-Intelligence-Applications-Dissertations/dp/1607500132/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1243929407&sr=8-1
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]
http://www.webont.org/owled/2009/>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alan gave me a pointer that I'll dig through a bit later.
>>>>
>>>> Lee
>>>>
>>>>> (the "range" only works in one direction, i.e., if Springer
>>>>> publishesBook YourBook and the range of publishesBook is Book,
>>>>> *then* YourBook is an instance of Book --- but not the other way
>>>>> round)
>>>>> Did this answer your question? Cheers, Uli
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Lee
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Drs Rinke Hoekstra
>>>
>>> Leibniz Center for Law | AI Department
>>> Faculty of Law | Faculty of Sciences
>>> Universiteit van Amsterdam | Vrije Universiteit
>>> Kloveniersburgwal 48 | De Boelelaan 1081a
>>> 1012 CX Amsterdam | 1081 HV Amsterdam
>>> +31-(0)20-5253499 | +31-(0)20-5987752
>>>
hoekstra@... |
hoekstra@...
>>>
>>> Homepage:
http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | Dr Thomas Schneider schneider (at) cs.man.ac.uk |
>> | School of Computer Science
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~schneidt |
>> | Kilburn Building, Room 2.114 phone +44 161 2756136 |
>> | University of Manchester |
>> | Oxford Road _///_ |
>> | Manchester M13 9PL (o~o) |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo--+
>>
>> Scosthrop (vb.)
>> To make vague opening or cutting movements with the hands when
>> wandering about looking for a tin opener, scissors, etc., in the hope
>> that this will help in some way.
>>
>> Douglas Adams, John Lloyd: The Deeper Meaning of Liff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---
> Drs Rinke Hoekstra
>
> Leibniz Center for Law | AI Department
> Faculty of Law | Faculty of Sciences
> Universiteit van Amsterdam | Vrije Universiteit
> Kloveniersburgwal 48 | De Boelelaan 1081a
> 1012 CX Amsterdam | 1081 HV Amsterdam
> +31-(0)20-5253499 | +31-(0)20-5987752
>
hoekstra@... |
hoekstra@...
>
> Homepage:
http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke>
>
>
>
>
>
>