|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Re: comment lost in http://www.w3.org/QA/May be it could help someone : - my comment to http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/html5-is-html-and-xml.html was an answer to http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/html5-is-html-and-xml.html#c102605 and http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/html5-is-html-and-xml.html#c102979 with a table such text/html | application/xhtml+xml ----------|---------------------- HTML 2.0 | HTML 3.2 | HTML 4.01 | XHTML 1.0 | XHTML 2 HTML 5 | HTML 5 - my comment to http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/html5.html was a request to add a multi-page version in http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/ such http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/Cover.html , due to the size of html 5 specification |
|
|
Re: comment lost in http://www.w3.org/QA/Nicolas, that was cool comments indeed. But It still have not got them. Le 7 févr. 2008 à 05:34, Nicolas Krebs a écrit : > May be it could help someone : > > - my comment … I really do not know what is happening. Could you make a very simple comment on one of the article? without URL and markup just words, note the date and time you made it, and send an email about it. I wonder if the spam filter is too aggressive. thanks. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: comment lost in http://www.w3.org/QA/Le 14 févr. 2008 à 05:53, Nicolas Krebs a écrit : > Here is a try (thanks to Live HTTP Headers) solved and published. I still do not know what was happening previously though. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |