Nice. I surfed the archives and found the benchmarks for versions 5.5. and 5.6. I'm only interested in the performance of AES/CFB encryption/decryption and RSA encryption/decryption/signature/verification. The RSA operations speed seems to be similar, but the AES/CFB operations seem to be about 56.5 % faster. Quite a difference.
I'm using AES/CFB to encrypt data streams, and that's why I'm trying to see if it would be justified to upgrade from 5.5.2 to 5.6.0. Seems like it may be the case.
Thanks very much for your help.
Walt.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Wei Dai
<weidai@...> wrote:
Try these links:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071011082234/http://cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20061201042628/http://www.cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Walter Villalba" <wvillalba@...>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:59 PM
To: "Crypto++ Users" <cryptopp-users@...>
Subject: comparing benchmarks of different library versions
I'm trying to locate the benchmarks for previous versions of the
Cryptopp library. I need to compare the AES algorithm speed using
versions 5.1, 5.5.2 and 5.6.0. I've found the latest benchmarks
( i.e. from version 5.6.0 ) in
http://www.cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html
but I couldn't find the previous ones.
I'm using 5.5.2 right now, and I'm trying to decide if I should update
to 5.6.0 or not. I believe the only reason would be a significant
improvement in speed for the AES algorithm ( I know there's some, but
I need to know if it justifies an update ).
This is a great library, congratulations on your work.
Thanks,
Walt.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to
cryptopp-users-unsubscribe@....
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
