« Return to Thread: confused about OGNL

Re: confused about OGNL

by Musachy Barroso :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

I did some more checking and it looks good. I would say after 2.1.8
gets released, we create the 2.1 branch and start working on 2.2,
which would use OGNL 2.7, how does that sound?

musachy

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@...> wrote:

> neat. the sync changes are also in 2.7, a little bit different but it
> is the same I think.
>
> musachy
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Dale Newfield<dale@...> wrote:
>> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>> OGNL 2.7 can compile expressions into java code which gives a very
>>> nice performance boost, so I am big +1 for upgrading. I am trying to
>>> figure if the changes in 2.6 mate it into 2.7 or not.
>>
>> alias svndiff='svn diff --diff-cmd /usr/bin/diff --extensions "-u -b -B -w"'
>>
>> svndiff http://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/ognl/tags/ognl_2-6-10
>> http://svn.opensymphony.com/svn/ognl/tags/ognl_2-6-11 | less
>>
>> I believe that this shows a single semantic change to a .java file, and I
>> believe that the contents of the block that had "synchronized (method)"
>> added around it in the 2.6.10 -> 2.6.11 transition also is synchronized the
>> same way in 2.7.2.
>>
>> This is not a comprehensive comparison, but it appears to indicate that the
>> answer to your question might be "yes".
>>
>> -Dale
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>



--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

 « Return to Thread: confused about OGNL