« Return to Thread: crosstool 0.43 ends with a sigkill?

Re: crosstool 0.43 ends with a sigkill?

by Omone :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Probably a clue:
I realized that if I try to build with option
GCC_LANGUAGES="c,c++"
rather than
GCC_LANGUAGES="c,c++,java"
the crosstool is built correctly.



Omone wrote:
I'm building a toolchain for arm-xscale precessor with the configuration at the and of the post.
Crosstool correctly downloads all prerequisites but ends unexpectedly with the message
"ld terminated with sigal 9 [sigkill]"
Any ideas?
It happens only (until now) with these configuration. I've tried others as the ones suggested in demo-arm-xscale.sh and all works good (unfortunatly I'm binded to these gcc-glibc-kernel combination)


---------------------------------
This is my configuration:

AR=
BINUTILS_DIR=binutils-2.15
BINUTILS_EXTRA_CONFIG=
BUILD=i686-pc-linux-gnu
BUILD_DIR=/home/user/crosstool-0.43/build/arm-xscale-linux-gnu/gcc-4.0.0-glibc-2.3.6
CC=
DEJAGNU=
EXTRA_TARGET_CFLAGS=
GCC_BUILD=
GCC_CORE_DIR=gcc-4.0.0
GCC_DIR=gcc-4.0.0
GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG=--with-cpu=xscale --enable-cxx-flags=-mcpu=xscale
GCC_HOST=
GCC_LANGUAGES=c,c++,java
GDB_DIR=
GLIBC_ADDON_OPTIONS==linuxthreads,
GLIBC_DIR=glibc-2.3.6
GLIBC_EXTRA_CC_ARGS=
GLIBC_EXTRA_CONFIG=
GLIBC_EXTRA_ENV=
JUST_DOWNLOAD=
KERNELCONFIG=/home/user/crosstool-0.43/arm.config
LINUX_DIR=linux-2.6.21
LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR=linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0
NO_DOWNLOAD=
PREFIX=/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.0.0-glibc-2.3.6/arm-xscale-linux-gnu
PTXDIST_DIR=
SHARED_MODE=--enable-shared
SRC_DIR=/home/user/crosstool-0.43/build/arm-xscale-linux-gnu/gcc-4.0.0-glibc-2.3.6
TARBALLS_DIR=/home/user/downloads
TARGET=arm-xscale-linux-gnu
TARGET_CFLAGS=-O
TOP_DIR=/home/user/crosstool-0.43
USE_SYSROOT=

 « Return to Thread: crosstool 0.43 ends with a sigkill?