aldana wrote:
> total commander is a clone of norton commander. something like midnight
> commander on linux.
>
> i thought the same: choice between usb 1.x and 2.0 is done far lower level
> that cygwin can really influence it. but the difference of speed made me
> consipicious.
>
> example, copying a single file (.tar.gz) of size ~70MB:
> with total commander it takes 20 sec.
> with cygwin it takes 4 minutes (!), which is plain too long to include it in
> my script.
>
> i know through its abstracton layer cygwin must be slower. but regarding
> that slowliness could it be another reason?
There could be. But why speculate? Write yourself a simple utility that uses
CopyFile() directly and see if that makes up the difference.
--
Larry Hall
http://www.rfk.comRFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
--
Unsubscribe info:
http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpleProblem reports:
http://cygwin.com/problems.htmlDocumentation:
http://cygwin.com/docs.htmlFAQ:
http://cygwin.com/faq/
